Skip to content

Conversation

@cx-rui-oliveira
Copy link
Collaborator

By submitting this pull request, you agree to the terms within the Checkmarx Code of Conduct. Please review the contributing guidelines for guidance on creating high-quality pull requests.

Description

Addition of new fields of results endpoint to sarif and json report.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update

Related Issues

https://checkmarx.atlassian.net/browse/AST-93150

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have updated the CLI help for new/changed functionality in this PR (if applicable)
  • All active GitHub checks for tests, formatting, and security are passing
  • The correct base branch is being used

Screenshots (if applicable)

Additional Notes

…e-results-endpoint-with-incremental-scanning-logic
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 7, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details353c72bc-26b2-4ed2-bd76-be9857d4f083

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

cx-diogo-rocha
cx-diogo-rocha previously approved these changes Aug 7, 2025
…e-results-endpoint-with-incremental-scanning-logic
…e-results-endpoint-with-incremental-scanning-logic
@cx-anurag-dalke cx-anurag-dalke merged commit 833bdf2 into main Aug 18, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@cx-anurag-dalke cx-anurag-dalke deleted the feature/AST-93150-backend-core-results-update-results-endpoint-with-incremental-scanning-logic branch August 18, 2025 00:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants